Modern nocturnes
document only the contrast between bright lights and the void. There are so
many other cool things that go bump in the night.
![]() |
Nocturne in Blue and Gold: Old Battersea Bridge, c. 1872-1875, James Abbott McNeill
Whistler
|
“We always paint nocturnes wearing headlamps,” said another
student. “The human eye takes about 25 minutes to fully adapt from bright
sunlight to complete darkness, and the headlamp continuously interrupts that.
Cameras lie, too, about what darkness looks like.”
![]() |
The Polish Rider, 1655,
Rembrandt van Rijn
|
She had just explained the technical problem with
painting nocturnes in a nutshell. They are driven by our current technology—headlamps
and easel lights—just as the high contrast of Frederic Remington’s nocturnes were
driven by camera technology of his day. Headlamps and easel lights exaggerate
the contrast between dark and light because they’re constantly stimulating our
eyes to stay in a photopic
(daylight) state.
![]() |
Winter, Midnight, 1894,
Childe Hassam
|
Human night vision is limited to discriminating between
different values of black and white, and the resolution and contrast are poorer.
But there are many steps between light and true darkness, and most nocturnes
are in fact painted using mesopic
vision, which we use when we’re faced with a combination of lighting.
![]() |
Moonlight, Ralph
Albert Blakelock
|
When we transition from day to night, our eyes create photopigments in the cones and rods to increase
sensitivity. The adaptation period is different for rod and cone cells. Cone
cells can do this in about ten minutes of darkness, but rods require between
30-45 minutes. There are, of course, differences in how fast each of us can
make the adaptation. Old age, as with so many other things, slows us down.
![]() |
Snow in New York, 1902, Robert
Henri
|
The transition from dark to light happens much more quickly.
It takes about five minutes for the eyes to bleach out the photopigments they
created to see in the dark.
![]() |
The Call for Help, Frederic
Remington
|
Humans are color-blind in true low-light situations. However,
at twilight, when most nocturnes were painted, we suffer from
something called the Purkinje shift. During the daytime, people are most
sensitive to light that is greenish-yellow. At night, people are more sensitive
to greenish-blue light.
![]() |
The Tornado, 1835,
Thomas Cole
|
The rods in our eyes (which are more
light-sensitive and thus more important in low-light situations) respond best
to green-blue light. The cones in the retina, which respond to colors, don’t
work well in lower-light situations. As the light gets lower,
our ability to see reds falls off.
![]() |
Moonrise, 1894,
David Davies
|
Scientists and tinkerers have long understood that red
lights don’t trigger our eyes into photopic vision. That’s why they’re used in
control rooms or the nocturnal animal displays at the zoo.
![]() |
Starry Night Over the Rhône, 1888, Vincent Van Gogh
|
Historically, nocturnes were about solitude, or sometimes, bad behavior.
In our jazzed, electric world, they're more likely to focus on lighting and
energy. The modern nocturne is always a description of civilization overtaking
nature. It is a brightly-lit subject set against an empty field of blackness.
By definition, that’s urban, and it contrasts our desires against our fears. The
best modern nocturnes create a place to go to escape encroaching darkness. I'd say there's more to that than just how our eyes work, but our vision certainly plays a part.
Nocturnes are very popular right now, both with painters and
with buyers.
I don’t paint them often, because I’m not a night person, but several of my
friends do, and do it well.
![]() |
Hiawatha, 1870, Thomas
Eakins
|
Today's post is absurdly larded with illustrations, but I wanted to show you the many ways in which people painted nocturnes before we had headlamps.










No comments:
Post a Comment