What paintings make
the final cut? How about choosing by committee?
![]() |
El camino hacia el pueblo, by Carol L. Douglas
|
I’m not alone in finding this difficult. Last night I sat
around the table at Jane Chapin’s house
with a group of artists, debating what we’ll submit. Richard Abraham and I are in the same position:
our strongest works are in a sense, redundant. They’re each of the same
subject. This makes us both a little nervous.
![]() |
Dry wash, by Carol L.
Douglas
|
I looked at his three top contenders and gave an opinion; he
looked at my three and gave an opinion, and it was unsettling, because he
counted back in a painting (Dry Wash)
that I’d already eliminated. Men and women approach paintings differently, and understanding
how the male mind works might be helpful in jurying.
My opinion is that any of Richard’s three contenders will
win him a prize. His options are all good. That makes me wonder if I’m dithering
over equally inconsequential differences. Still, the choice of submissions is
the most difficult job of the week, and it behooves us to take it seriously.
![]() |
La casa de los abuelitos,
by Carol L. Douglas
|
A painting should be—as the old saw goes—compelling at 300 feet,
30 feet, and three feet. The first
question, then, is what will draw someone from the other side of the room. To
answer that definitively, I’d have to be inside the head of the juror (Stephen
Day) and I’m not. Looking at his work only tells me so much. I can’t know
what his goals are, how his day is going, or any of the other myriad thoughts
that go into his decision.
Hoodoos in training,
by Carol L. Douglas
|
Why do I distrust my judgment? I’m always most intrigued by
the paintings that are terrifically difficult to master. That’s why I love Jonathan
Submarining, from Castine 2016. The viewer may just see a Castine Class sailing school
bobbing around on the waves, but I see a tough painting done knee deep in the
surf and executed well.
This is true too with Dry
Wash. The only reason I might change my mind at the last minute is that the
dappled light and rocks are well-executed. But the other two better meet the 300-feet
challenge.
Castigando del caballo muerto, by Carol L. Douglas
|
That puts me in a quandary. I’ve written
before about who I trust to critique my work. I messaged images to two people
yesterday: my husband and Bobbi Heath.
Their opinion was consistent (and it matched, for the record, Jane Chapin’s).
But in the end the decision rests with me, and it’s no fun.










