If you think it’s too
complicated to draw, you’re looking at it all wrong.
![]() |
Winch (American Eagle), by Carol L. Douglas, courtesy of Camden Falls Gallery.
|
This exercise builds on last
week’s Monday Morning Art School, where we did simple drawings of our homes
and then experimented with cropping them. The idea was to see beauty in the
everyday, and to see how even big architectural drawings are just a combination
of smaller shapes.
This week I want you to go back to your homes, find
something prosaic, familiar and commonplace as a subject, and then analyze your
drawings in terms of these simple shapes.
![]() |
| That painting is just a series of simple shapes. |
I’m near-sighted. I just need to remove my glasses and I’m
working in simple shapes. That’s more difficult for someone with perfect vision;
you poor schmoes are going to have to squint. Either way, by blurring your
vision, you can reduce the scene before you to a few basic elements.
When you blur your vision, smaller shapes fall away and form
a few, larger shapes. It’s much easier to break down a scene if you can’t see
it in sharp detail. You don’t have to do this for every drawing—just enough to
grasp the concept of simplification.
![]() |
| Old Greek Revival farmhouse in Western New York. |
Consider this elderly farmhouse I photographed in western
New York. With my glasses on, it might seem daunting—a collection of windows,
doors, pillars, peeling paint and overgrown shrubberies. But it’s easily broken
down into a series of rectangles, triangles and circles. Anyone can draw those,
even the people who tell me they can’t draw a straight line. “I’m going to draw
an abandoned Greek Revival house” is a lot more daunting than “I’m going to nail
down these few shapes.”
![]() |
| This is a computer estimation of what it looks like to me without my glasses. |
Concentrating on the big shapes not only makes starting
easier, it leads to more accurate measurement. It’s much easier to draw the big
rectangle of the portico and fit the pieces into it than to start with one
window and grow the shape outwards.
![]() |
| Either way, it breaks down to these approximate shapes. Anyone can draw them! |
Once you’ve drawn the basic shapes, you can work inward to
add detail. When you have a decent basic sketch, you can start thinking about the
composition you might want to paint. A good composition has a variety of shapes
and angles.
The painting at top is of the American Eagle in drydock. A
boat is a long, lean thing, in or out of the water. A side view isn’t its most flattering
angle. (Come to think of it, that’s true for me, too.) For this reason, it poses
a compositional problem in drydock or at its berth. Here, I’ve reverse-engineered
the drawing into a series of simple shapes, so you can see my solution
to the problem.
| My house drawing from last week. |
Let’s go back to my shape drawing of my house from last
week. In the end, that can be reduced to a black-and-white cut-out (below). Simplified,
is there a coherent black-and-white pattern? Is it pleasing enough to bother
with? If the answer is no, then back to the drawing board. That is the point of
a thumbnail. If it doesn’t work in a tiny sketch, it isn’t going to work in a
painting.
![]() |
| Does it reduce to a few simple shapes that make a pleasing pattern? I think so. |
Your assignment—like my class here in Rockport—is to choose
a simple scene in or near your house and break it down to extremely simple
shapes. How do they intersect? Is any one intersection more compelling than the
rest? If so, that’s probably your focal point.






No comments:
Post a Comment