Long before
ecofeminism was an idea, these women produced clear-eyed, scientific
observations of nature.
![]() |
Cerise de Montmorency
cherry (Prunus avium), with specimen originating in Linden, Maryland; 1910,
watercolor by Deborah Griscom Passmore, courtesy USDA
|
I would never know about the US Department of Agriculture’s Pomological
Watercolor Collection if it weren’t for an artist and activist named Parker Higgins. Starting around
2015, he
began investigating why the USDA kept their digitized collection behind a
paywall. He found that the USDA had miscalculated when entering the rough-and-tumble
market of digital data, spending $300,000 to earn just $600 in fees. He then
pushed public officials to release the pictures to the public for free.
The watercolors would have remained unknown, except that Higgins then taught himself to program enough to build a twitter
bot. Follow @pomological,
and you can see a new Old Fruit Picture every three hours.
![]() |
Diseased Lisbon lemon
(Citrus limon); 1910, watercolor by Elsie Lower Pomeroy, courtesy
USDA
|
The USDA’s Pomological Collection was cutting edge long
before Higgins took it up. At a time when women were barely represented in the
workforce, they were the driving force behind this work.
Women were just beginning to attend art school in the latter
half of the 19th century. For most of them, a career like Mary Cassatt’s was out of
the question. Working as a government illustrator was an acceptable career
choice. About a third of the USDA’s pomological artists were women, and just
three of them were responsible for more than half the collection: Deborah Griscom Passmore, Amanda Almira Newton, and Mary
Daisy Arnold.
![]() |
Japanese persimmon
(variety Hachiya); 1915, watercolor by Amanda Newton, courtesy USDA
|
The paintings were mostly produced in the thirty-year span
from 1886 to 1916. They were intended for use as illustrations in USDA publications
directed toward farmers. This was a time of high immigration and rapid growth
westward; ten states joined the Union in that thirty-year period. Rapidly-expanding
agriculture went along with rapidly-expanding population. The hunt was on for fruits
that could endure shipping, and farmers worked with the USDA to test and then
grow these cultivars. The artists were sent samples of these fruits
from farmers across the nation. They then made scientifically-accurate illustrations
for USDA publications and records. The majority of these cultivars no longer
exist.
Deborah Griscom Passmore was the daughter of a Quaker farmer
from Delaware County, PA. She studied at the Pennsylvania
Academy of Fine Arts and then went on to Europe. Passmore was hired by the
USDA in 1892, and her talents were quickly recognized. Within a year she was head
of the department, which at the time had fifty artists attached to it. One of
her first tasks was to paint exhibits for the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in
Chicago. She worked for the USDA for 19 years, and was responsible for a fifth
of its 7500 paintings.
![]() |
Dunlap variety of
strawberries (Fragaria species), with specimen originating in Geneva, New
York; 1912, watercolor by Mary Daisy Arnold, courtesy USDA
|
Less is known about the life of Amanda A. Newton. She was the
granddaughter of Isaac Newton, the first commissioner
of the USDA, who died when she was a child. She introduced the innovation of
wax models of fruit to the survey, making about 300 specimens herself. Mary Daisy
Arnold’s origins are similarly obscure, but she was known to have attended art
school in New York. When she wasn’t painting fruit for the USDA, she painted
landscapes in oils.
Elsie Lower Pomeroy was
the one female USDA illustrator who went on to an independent painting practice. Born in New Castle, PA,
she was raised in Washington and attended the Corcoran School of
Art. She worked in the Washington USDA office, married a staff pomologist and moved with him to Riverside, CA. There,
she became involved in the California
Realism movement.
19th century women watercolorists have an unjust
reputation for anemic, ‘maidenly’ work, but there is nothing hesitant about
these watercolors. They are careful technical renderings with big, juicy color.
From a time long before ecofeminism was an idea, they are clear-eyed observations
of nature.





1 comment:
Thanks Carol - these are beautiful! Looking forward to seeing more on twitter
Post a Comment