![]() |
| Great Danes and Doberman Pinschers talk about what they plan to wear to my daughter's wedding. |
Last night I assembled an august panel of artists to help me
with a project. Barb is a printmaker with an art degree from University of
Maine. Sandy is a gallerist with degrees from Pratt and Hunter College. Together,
we dressed 42 dogs in wedding finery. (As so often happens in sweatshops, I ‘forgot’
to pay them.)
“Is this art?” I asked two other artist friends.
“It’s like asking if a soy product in the shape of a chicken
leg is food,” said one. “Technically, yes, but it’s bad food.”
“I guess the individual sculptures are art,” hedged the
other, who then raised the question of whether they’re craft or even, just
possibly, crap.
![]() |
| Two coats of silver and three of glitter... good taste, by the way, is repressive at times. |
‘Artistry’ is easier to define than art itself. That means
the skill necessary to produce a work of the imagination. But what defines the
product of the imagination as art rather than engineering or craft?
Ars longa, vita brevis,
wrote Hippocrates. He probably meant that it takes a long time to acquire and
perfect artistry, but that the practitioner has only a short lifespan in which
to practice. We repeat it, instead, to mean, “art lasts forever, but life is
short.” That is, of course, a modern conceit. The ancients understood that “what
is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” (2 Cor. 4:18)
| Barb felt that a DeWalt glue gun was not the tool for the job. |
Plato
said that art is always a copy of a copy, an imitation of reality. This leads
us from the truth and to illusion, making art inherently dangerous. (Rich words
from a philosopher!) Elsewhere, he hinted that the artist, by divine inspiration,
makes a better copy of truth than may be found in everyday experience. This
makes artists prophets of sorts.
A lot of artists have had a go at defining art. Many are
coy, like Marc Chagall,
who said that “Art is the unceasing effort to compete with the beauty of
flowers–and never succeeding.”
Even in non-traditional art, imitation is a recurring theme.
“Art is either a plagiarist or a revolutionary,” said Paul Gauguin. What makes
an Andy Warhol painting of soup cans different from the soup cans themselves?
Intent and meaning. Pablo Picasso said that art is a lie that makes us see the truth.
In some way, art is the taking of an idea and making it
manifest. Otherwise, it’s just a fleeting thought.
![]() |
| Sandy and I sewed their garments, Barb dressed them. |
People frequently debate the line between art and craft. Art
is useless in practical terms; it exists solely to drive emotion and thought. Fine
craft does that and more. It must serve a practical purpose along with being beautiful.
Since I didn’t drill their noses out to hold flowers, my party dogs fall on the
side of art.
Neither fine art nor fine craft are mass-produced, however.
That is manufacturing. Those brass birds from Home Goods, as inscrutable as
their meaning and purpose might be, qualify as neither art nor craft.
“The craftsman knows what he wants to make before he makes
it. The making of a work of art… is a strange and risky business in which the
maker never knows quite what he is making until he makes it, wrote R.G. Collingwood in
The Principles of Art. That sounds
very nice, until I think of dye-master Jane
Bartlett throwing pots of color into the snow to see what shows up. Her
textiles end up as clothing, but her process is wildly unpredictable.





