![]() |
The Toilet of Venus (The Rokeby Venus), 1644, Diego
Velázquez, courtesy National Gallery of London. He painted at least three nudes
despite the official disapproval of the Spanish crown.
|
Although ancient Egyptians wore a minimal amount of
clothing, nudity in their art meant a defenseless state, often representing the
dead or vanquished foes. The earliest reference to figure modeling is a legend
about the fifth-century BC Greek painter, Zeuxis. It was said that he
couldn’t find a woman beautiful enough to represent Helen of Troy, so he
used features from five models. He is also reputed to have died of laughter
after an older, wealthy patron insisted on modeling for Aphrodite. There is no doubt
that the Greeks used real models; the courtesan Phryne modeled for Praxiteles’ Aphrodite of Knidos,
the first life-size female nude in western art. Sadly, all these works are lost
to us today.
The ancient Greeks also bequeathed us contrapposto,
or counterpoise. This means the figure standing with most of its weight on one
foot so that its shoulders and arms twist from the hips and legs.
![]() |
Kritios Boy, c. 480 BC, is the first known example of contrapposto.
Courtesy Acropolis Museum.
|
With the rise of Rome, art modeling disappeared in the west.
It didn’t return until the late Renaissance. Michelangelo and Raphael started the study of
the nude body. However, they didn’t intend to paint their models nude; they
were just trying to understand the figure better for clothed painting.
In general, artists used their apprentices—always boys and
young men—to model whatever figures they needed. There were exceptions, include Raphael, who
made nude drawings of his mistress, and Lorenzo
Lotto and Caravaggio,
who used prostitutes as life models.
But in general, if non-apprentice models were used, they had a personal
relationship to the artist. Many of these relationships are legendary: Rembrandt
and his beloved Saskia, Botticelli and Simonetta Vespucci, Raphael and Margarita Luti. The
working model, paid for his or her labors, did not yet exist.
The tension within Christendom about naked bodies was
most extreme in the court of the art-loving Spanish King Philip IV,
patron of Velázquez.
Velázquez could paint the reclining Rokeby
Venus under the king’s protection, because Philip owned many nudes himself.
At the same time, painting or owning nudes—or even portraits in the fashionably-low
necklines of the day—was officially discouraged.
In the 19th century, with the atelier system of training
firmly established, professional artists’ models begin to appear. Olympe Pélissier
was a courtesan and model in Paris; she had been sold into sexual slavery twice
as a teenage girl. Victorine
Meurent (Édouard
Manet’s Olympia) was a painter in her own right. Fanny Eaton was a Jamaican
mixed-race charwoman who had a short, meteoric career modeling for the Pre-Raphaelites;
her exotic features could represent a variety of characters. Fanny Cornforth was
the model for, and mistress of, Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
Cornforth’s career was indicative of a disturbing trend that
continued into the 20th century. Earlier artists painted women with
whom they were intimate; the new artists became intimate with women they
painted.
![]() |
Study of a Seated Nude Woman Wearing a Mask, 1863-66,
Thomas Eakins, courtesy Philadelphia Museum of Art. Modesty in Victorian
ateliers was preserved by a mask for women and a loincloth for men.
|
Even as the need for figure and anatomy studies was publicly
acknowledged, prudishness dictated that men wore loincloths and women had their
faces covered while modeling. By 1886, Thomas Eakins had been
teaching at the Pennsylvania Academy for ten years. He had transformed it into
the leading art school in America.
In January 1886, lecturing about anatomy to a mixed-gender
class, Eakins removed a loincloth from a male model so that he could trace the musculature
of the pelvis (which supports the back and, in turn, the whole human body). He
was forced to resign.
The 20th century brought a decline in figure
painting as an art form, largely due to the decline of, historical and narrative
painting. Still, drawing the human figure from life is considered a great way
to learn draftsmanship. This is in part because the hierarchy
of genres considered people more important than landscape or
objects. It’s also because we have a connection to other people.
I’ll be teaching a class about modeling for the Knox
County Art Society on Saturday, September 7. For more information, see here.




