Knight, Death and the
Devil, woodcut, by Albrecht Dürer, 1513
|
Part of the heated discussion that ensued after my post Friday
about the so-called
problem of Christian music expressed a general irritation with performers
who identify themselves as Christian artists. We’re all aware of the capacity
of modern artists to drape themselves over the cross for marketing purposes. However,
there has always been a distinction between artists who work in religious themes
because that is their marketplace, and those who are genuinely faith-driven.
Albrecht Dürer achieved extraordinary success very quickly.
He produced a variety of works including many of a secular nature, and actively
sought and exploited the patronage of Maximillian I. None of that indicates a
profoundly religious man.
However, Dürer left a large body of writing that indicates that
at some time he had a true religious conversion. He became an early and
enthusiastic follower of Martin Luther. His new Protestant sympathies can
be felt in his later work, a transition pushed along by the death of his patron
in 1519.
In 1524, Dürer wrote that “because of our Christian faith we
have to stand in scorn and danger, for we are reviled and called heretics.” And
in expressing thanks for the gift of one of Luther’s books, he wrote, “I pray
Your Honor to convey my humble gratitude to His Electoral grace, and beg him
humbly that he will protect the praiseworthy Dr. Martin Luther for the sake of
Christian truth. It matters more than all the riches and power of this world,
for with time everything passes away; only the truth is eternal.”
Circle of the Lustful: Francesca da Rimini ('The Whirlwind
of Lovers') 1826-7, from William Blake’s
illustrations of Dante’s Divine Comedy.
|
William Blake is another artist whose copious writings make
his religious fervor easy to document. However, understanding them is another
matter entirely. (I confess I take him in small doses.) His illustrations for
Dante’s Divine Comedy include extensive margin notes in which he argues with
Dante’s theology.
Blake was literally a visionary: he saw visions from
childhood on. He was a believer, but he hated the church. His contemporaries thought
him quite mad. But his poem “And did those feet in ancient time” comes down to
us as the great patriotic hymn Jerusalem, set by Sir Hubert
Parry in 1916.
I kind of like his assessment of the character of Jesus:
If he had been
Antichrist Creeping Jesus,
He'd have done anything to please us:
Gone sneaking into Synagogues
And not us'd the Elders & Priests like Dogs,
But humble as a Lamb or Ass,
Obey'd himself to Caiaphas.
God wants not Man to Humble himself.
He'd have done anything to please us:
Gone sneaking into Synagogues
And not us'd the Elders & Priests like Dogs,
But humble as a Lamb or Ass,
Obey'd himself to Caiaphas.
God wants not Man to Humble himself.
Conversion on the Way to Damascus by Michelangelo Merisi Caravaggio, 1601
|
Compare these two painters to Michelangelo Merisi Caravaggio,
another brilliant painter of religious scenes. His patrons were Cardinal
Francesco del Monte and Cardinal Girolamo Mattei, and his subject matter was overwhelmingly religious, but Caravaggio could by no stretch of the
imagination be described as a “Christian artist.” A brawler with an extensive
police record, he managed to nick a rival in the groin with his sword, severing
an artery and killing the poor man. This led to Caravaggio’s exile and
ultimately to his death.
Let me know if you’re
interested in painting with me in Maine in 2014 or Rochester at any time.
Click here for
more information on my Maine workshops!
2 comments:
I don't think you can contrast and compare so easily. Your two selected "religious" artists expressed themselves in their writings; Caravaggio did not. Your summaries of the artists' lives seem journalistic - particularly Caravaggio's. And you did not venture an opinion on whose religious art is purer/more sincere - and can we consider - better?
I almost never consider art as "better" or "worse," since as a working artist and teacher I've long since discovered that almost all work has some unique spark of genius to it. My summaries are of necessity limited by the nature of a blog. Both Blake's and Dürer's writings are available extensively. I recommend in particular "The Divine Comedy of William Blake" by David Bindman, a book which I've treasured for years. For Dürer, I don't have such an easy recommendation, and in truth I'd like to understand more about his religious conversion, since it seems simplistic to say, "something happened around 1520 that made him a follower of Luther."
Another artist I would have mentioned had I not run out of room was the lovely British visionary painter, Sir Stanley Spencer.
Thank you so much for your comments.
Post a Comment